Automated vulnerability scanner

We didn't understand pentest pricing until we were already in the cycle. Here's what nobody explains upfront.

You hire a pentest firm. Pay the invoice. Get a report.

That report is a snapshot of your app on the days the consultant was logged in. When the engagement ends, so does the coverage.

Your devs fix the findings. Now you want to know: are we actually fixed? That question is not included in the original invoice. Verification after remediation is typically a new conversation — sometimes a new statement of work.

So either you trust your devs to test their own fixes (bad idea), wait three months for the next quarterly pentest to find out (expensive way to learn), or pay for a retest window separately (fine, but now you're managing two invoices and two scheduling threads with the firm).

We built Nautillo Pro because this felt like a solvable problem.

Automated vulnerability scanner. Run it before your pentest — so the manual team isn't spending €500/hour finding CORS misconfigs your devs could've fixed in an afternoon. Run it after every fix — HTTP proof that the remediation held, in minutes, no new invoice.

Free for a single URL. €149/month for full domain coverage.

Not replacing manual pentests. Still need those for SOC 2, compliance mandates, business logic attacks. But for the feedback loop between engagements? Different cost structure entirely.

Would appreciate feedback.