Hi all,
I've been running around with an idea for waaay too long and need to take this first step... Please bear with me...
Short backstory: I'm a freelance Consultant in the European/Dutch high tech industry, guiding and teaching organizations on how to define and manage product requirements.
One obstacle that is hard to remove, is to get the quality of the Requirement consistently high. I believe that it's not through a lack of knowledge on the authors part, but due to the time pressure they face.
A few years back (yes, that long) I thought about doing something about this; helping requirements engineers to write better requirements efficiently. This can be done by using requirements boilerplates (look up 'Easy Approach to Requirements Syntax', or EARS, if you're interested); predefined textual formats that are clear and concise and leave the author to think about the content instead of the formulation.
A while ago I decided to put thoughts into action. So, what am I working on? It's called Boilah; an on-line boilerplate-based authoring tool where the user can select from a range of predefined, configurable boilerplates and fill in 'the blanks' with their expertise. Then, they can quickly copy-paste the full text into whatever tool they are using to manage the test (e.g. Word, JIRA, or a specialized Requirements Management tool). This application independence makes it unique, in my opinion, and very flexible.
The neat thing is, the concept works for Requirements, but also for User Stories, Product Vision statements and Test Cases/Acceptance criteria (each of which could be managed in different applications...). And that's just the 'Product Definition' area. I can imagine (but have no feedback, yet) that the concept is applicable in different fields, too; anywhere where people are writing 'standard' texts where they need to make choices and/or fill in the blanks.
Oh, and data security is not really an issue (a concern for some big companies I've worked with) as the actual authoring is all Front-end only and does not go to the server... (with minor caveats)
Okay, so where am I now?
BUT...
I'm still really at the Validating stage... So I'd love to get your feedback on the whole thing.
What next steps would you suggest?
I really appreciate the feedback/encouragement/reality checks!
Well, I don't know. For example: what is the difference between Boilah and a default created boilerplate in Notion for example? Are people willing to pay for an extra tool that just gives access to predefined questions that can also be added to tools that are already in use by businesses?
Thanks, @Jvds.
I believe that Notion has the concept of page templates. That's what you're referring to, right? But I don't believe (but will check) if it has options to create textual templates for individual statements, correct?
I do see Notion as being a possible target for the texts created with Boilah (if that's where you're managing the requirements/User Stories/...
The idea is that Boilah will help the author to focus on the individual statements but will also be able to give hints about the content the author has provided, warning of vague or ambiguous statements. It will allow the user to save certain data and generally focusses on productivity and quality.
Thanks for the tip! I'll look into what Notion offers.
Yeah, in my view I had the thought that you could eventual use multiple pages indeed with each of them another type of requirements for example, but your description makes sense indeed.