GitHub Actions failed. Logs are 800 lines. You have no idea why. Sound familiar?
As a solo dev, every CI failure costs me 30-60 minutes of log archaeology. Comparing runs, spotting patterns, figuring out if it's a flaky test or a real break — it's painful and repetitive.
GitHub's built-in tools don't help much. You either scroll through walls of logs or write custom scripts just to understand what happened.
I'm building a simple GitHub App that:
- Tells you exactly why your pipeline failed — in plain English
- Identifies slow steps across runs
- Spots flaky patterns before they block your deployment
$15/month per user. No dashboards. Just answers.
Quick validation question: do you waste time debugging GitHub Actions failures? Would plain-English failure explanations save you real time?
Honest yes/no — validating before I write a single line of code.
Unfortunately for me it's a no, i'd rather copy paste the logs into a free LLM or ask copilot
$15/month is more expensive than copilot pro...