Every time I complete or am halfway through a project I always go to a more experienced developer to review my code. I usually upload my files to github, send him code lines on the chat or send him a pastebin link with my code to review my code.
Don't you think there should be a better way to let somebody review your code?
What do you do when you want somebody else to review your code?
Just read this excellent post by @mkinoshi12, you might find it interesting: https://www.indiehackers.com/post/i-want-to-help-people-get-code-reviews-dbdeac1547
GitHub's code review workflows are probably as good as any these days. I'd add that it's much harder to have someone do a full review of a complete codebase and expect them to catch everything that might need catching, since they essentially need to get full context on the architecture, intended functionality, edge cases, etc. in order to be useful. You will probably also learn less from their review in that approach. Where possible I'd suggest having someone review incremental changes (via PRs or otherwise) as you go, so you can really get into the substance of specific implementation decisions and possible pitfalls. GitHub PR reviews are great for this purpose.
If your IDE is visual studio or visual studio Code, you can take a, Look at the "live share" plugin
This comment was deleted 6 years ago