I kept watching people build great pages with AI and then quietly give up right before publishing them — so I built a Chrome extension to fix that last step
Hey IH, I'm the maker of HTML Deployer. Sharing the story behind it and looking for honest feedback — a lot of you are exactly the builders I had in mind.
The problem I couldn't unsee
Generating a decent landing page with ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini stopped being hard a while ago. Ask, get HTML back, done.
What's not solved is the five minutes after: copy the code, open a new tab, create a repo or Netlify project, paste, configure, wait, hope nothing broke. For non-devs, that gap is where good ideas quietly die — not because the page was bad, but because "I have HTML" never became "I have a URL."
I watched this happen to people close to me enough times that it started bugging me.
First version was wrong, and I'm glad I noticed early
My first idea was to build a hosting platform — upload HTML, we host it, here's your link. Simple to explain. I killed it within a couple of weeks.
Reasoning: building my own hosting means asking people to trust a brand-new product with their uptime forever, and locking them out of hosting they might already pay for. That's not removing friction, just relocating it and adding lock-in on top.
The actual unlock
The fix wasn't a new destination — it was moving the point of action to where the problem happens: inside the AI chat itself, the moment the code appears.
That's HTML Deployer. A Chrome extension that watches ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini in real time. When an HTML block shows up, a Deploy button appears next to it. Click it, preview across desktop/tablet/mobile, then push to Netlify, Vercel, GitHub Pages, your own FTP hosting, or a self-hosted agent — or just export a ZIP. No account required, no forced lock-in.
What was actually hard to build
Not the button. The detection layer.
Who it's actually for
Three groups kept showing up: marketers/solo builders who just want a URL, freelancers/indie devs shipping demos without repeating manual FTP, and small agencies running campaign microsites who want juniors deploying safely without touching production.
The common thread isn't "I don't know how to deploy" — most could figure it out. It's "I don't want that step between the idea and the result."
Where I need help / feedback
If you want to poke at it: it's free — HTML Deployer on the Chrome Web Store. Genuinely more curious how other builders here handle the "AI output → live thing" gap — doubt HTML is the only place it shows up.
What stood out to me is that you didn't remove a technical step—you removed a momentum break.
A surprising number of products lose users in the gap between "it's possible" and "it's live." If AI keeps reducing creation time, those transition points become much more valuable to solve than the creation itself.
That's right, AI helps us to create but doesn't help us to publish it online.
Glad it resonated.
Your reply made me think there's one strategic decision sitting underneath that transition which becomes much more significant as the product grows, but I don't think I can explain the reasoning properly in a thread without oversimplifying it.
If you're interested, what's the best email to reach you on?