
Hey everyone,
I think most interview prep advice is solving the wrong problem.
Everyone focuses on:
“tell better stories”
“improve your answers”
“practice behavioral questions”
But a growing part of hiring isn’t even that anymore.
It’s:
And people are failing these before they even get a real interview.
The real problem isn’t skill. It’s unfamiliarity.
You get invited to something like a HireVue assessment and:
You get one shot, no feedback, and you’re out.
That’s not a “skills gap.”
That’s a format gap.
So I built something different
Instead of teaching people how to interview, I built Candidate Falcon to let them:
→ practice the exact assessment format they’re about to face
Not tips. Not theory.
Actual simulations:
The goal is simple: remove the “what is this?” moment.
What surprised me
I didn’t start with a big vision.
I built two small tools:
Both started getting traction on their own.
That’s when it clicked:
this isn’t a niche problem, it’s just ignored.
Most platforms go broad.
This only works if you go narrow and deep.
That's when I understood that, if I wanted to expand I needed only one place where to offer them all, rather than having scattered places all over the web, each focusing only on 1 single prep type. That's why I started Candidate Falcon
My uncomfortable take
We’ve basically accepted a hiring system where:
And we call that “fair.”
What I’m trying to figure out now
Curious what you think:
If you’ve taken one of these assessments, did it actually feel like it was testing your ability…
or just how quickly you adapted to a weird system?
Site: candidatefalcon.com
I think you're onto something big here, and it's a really interesting take. I actually know a few indie hackers and founders who'd likely be happy to answer some of your questions about scaling SaaS products or pricing niche value propositions.