Looking for a few engineers to help test a lightweight PR review tool
Hey folks đź‘‹
I’m one of the founders of Hikaflow. We’re building a lightweight tool that acts as a second pass on pull requests, helping with code review, testing signals, and other repetitive engineering checks, especially for individuals and small teams.
We’re at a stage where the product is ready, but instead of launching broadly, we want to learn directly from real engineers working on real code.
Right now, we’re looking for:
- Solo developers or small teams
- Active GitHub projects (public or private)
- People who use PRs regularly and move fast
This is not a pitch, and there’s no obligation. The goal is simply:
- You try it on a real PR
- We see what works, what doesn’t
- You give brutally honest feedback
If this sounds interesting, comment here, happy to share more context or answer questions.
Appreciate this community a lot, and excited to learn from you all.
This sounds like a real pain point — especially when PR review overhead grows faster than code complexity.
Curious — as engineers start testing it, what’s the first concrete behavior you’re treating as a signal that the tool is actually reducing review friction?
For example:
I’ve found those early behavioral shifts usually show up well before teams can confidently say “this saves us X hours.”