4
6 Comments

Packaged a remote Shopify setup offer (sections + product options)

Milestone: packaged a remote Shopify decoration offer for non-China stores.

What’s ready (practice + acceptance shots, not claiming revenue):

  • Tier A sections · $249
  • Tier C product options · $179
  • Tier B landing · $399 as later add-on (builder plan gate still messy on our drill store)

Offer mechanics: Collaborator → Free-first configure → screenshot acceptance → revoke → handoff.

Screenshots are from our own drill/dev store, not a paying client case.

Next: post only where rules allow; no cold DMs this week.

No MRR / client count claims here — still validating outbound channels.

on September 13, 2026
  1. 1

    Three priced tiers before a single paying client is solving the wrong problem. I ran a services business for two decades and the constraint at your stage is never packaging, it is that nobody buys a store build from someone whose only screenshots come from a drill store. I would do the next three on real live stores at no charge in exchange for a named reference and before/after numbers, then price off what those owners tell you the work was worth.

  2. 1

    The free-first configure step is doing a lot of work here. I’d test one tier with five named stores and track the current workaround, why now, access granted, acceptance, paid yes/no, and reason. What commitment do you ask for before you touch the store?

    1. 1

      Appreciate the push. The free-first step matters because it keeps App spend in the buyer's own hands: two separate payments — our one-time service fee, plus any App subscription they choose in Shopify if they leave the free tier.

      On commitments: we ask for a temporary Collaborator invite (themes / apps / online store only) — no password, no permanent admin. Access is revoked after screenshot acceptance; the handoff note covers how to edit, uninstall, and who pays App fees. Nothing ships without the owner's screenshot check.

      Why now: the packaging and acceptance flow are repeatable on our drill store, and posting is the cheapest way to find the few owners who actually value these tiers. A five-store pilot like you suggest is exactly the validation step we'd want before scaling anything — no revenue or client-count claims here.

  3. 1

    The packaging and pricing are concrete, but the drill-store work can’t tell you whether merchants value those specific deliverables. Have any real store owners shown interest in one tier over the others yet, even before paying?

    1. 1

      Fair point, and it's exactly the stage we're at. The flow and pricing are ready on our own drill/dev store — there's no paying client case yet, and I won't pretend there is. Posting now is the cheapest way to test whether store owners actually value these three deliverables rather than the packaging. Any genuine inquiry from a real store owner is the signal we're looking for. Happy to share the acceptance checklist in-thread so you can judge the deliverables themselves.

      1. 1

        The real-store inquiry is the right signal to watch. If you’re open to it, what’s the best email to reach you on?