Pitch us your SaaS and get distributed

Im in!

This is a great initiative. The 2–5 minute live format feels much more authentic than a polished pitch deck, and the real-time Q&A can give founders valuable feedback from an actual audience. Excited to see the products that get featured!

Great idea a nice way for rounders to practice there pitch and get feedback.

This is a good idea because founders can get real feedback without making a polished pitch deck. One thing I would add is a short form before the live show. Ask each founder for their one-line pitch, target user, and biggest problem they solve. Then share those before the event so people know who they want to hear. After the show, give each founder a short recording or clip they can reuse on X. That could make the event useful even for people who cannot join live.

bro this is actually a great idea. respect for helping founders. hope u get some awesome products.

This is a great opportunity. I’m building StockLens AI, an AI-powered platform that helps investors analyze stocks and make research faster and more structured.

Would love to pitch it live, get feedback from the audience, and share what I’ve learned building it. 🚀

X: Nitesh Nagpal
Product: StockLens AI

Great initiative

Just DM you. Eager to participate. Very cool idea!!

Love the idea. Real products, real founders, and live feedback—much more valuable than a polished pitch deck. Great opportunity for indie builders!

Thanks that's a great initiative. Here's my product : Built to close the gap between self‑awareness and real change, AEGIS is a clinical AI OS for leadership and whole‑business transformation: it maps your inner architecture (Shadow / Light / Balance) from raw data (quiz, sessions, tracking), and operationalizes it via a People Board, Decision Log, Pulse Cards, and a toolkit of sovereign practices that scale from individual to organization.

I admire the choice to maintain this understated! ~

When a founder discusses what they're building in the moment, it’s more impactful than a well-practiced pitch. When you receive the product, you also get a feeling for how clearly they understand the problem.

It’s especially interesting to restrict to one sentence. If you can’t explain to us what you are constructing simply, a few more slides will probably not fix us.

The interactive question-and-answer session gives it an extra dimension. Sometimes the questions asked reveal more about the product than the pitch itself.

The constraint that makes this work is forcing a one-sentence pitch before anyone gets stage time. I've sat through hundreds of founder pitches as an angel investor, and the ones that can't compress to one sentence rarely have a real wedge, they have a feature list. I'd apply that same filter to who gets on air: reject the vague one-liners before the live show, not after.

This is a great format for discovering products beyond the usual polished launch posts. GeekyAnts would be an interesting company to hear from too, especially around the AI products and engineering work happening in this space.

This is a great initiative. A lot of founders focus heavily on getting distribution, but once the right customers start showing interest, especially enterprise clients, compliance and security questions can quickly become a bottleneck. I help SaaS and AI startups assess their compliance gaps and prepare privacy, risk, vendor due diligence, and security readiness documentation. Would be interesting to see how founders here are handling this side of growth as they scale. 🔐

Building StareBrain — natural language commands for Android (say what you want done, it shows you exactly what it'll do, you confirm, it happens). Waitlist's open, prototype's working for a handful of commands, still pre-launch.

X: @starebrain

Down to pitch if a not-fully-shipped-yet product fits what you're looking for — happy to be upfront about exactly where it's at.

Jaime. I’m Asad, co-founder of CuToken. We’re building around a problem AI builders constantly face: controlling and optimizing token usage without sacrificing output quality.

I’d love to connect and explore whether there’s a way CuToken and Aproov could help each other reach more AI/SaaS founders. Always better when indie founders can create distribution together rather than compete for attention.

Cool!

Hey I built Buildside . app to be the future of social media for founders. It offers valuable tools for SaaS founders to build in public and grow together. I built this as a necessity to build in public as a means to grow SaaS and services.

I built Whale Core — a zero-latency asynchronous Python engine that tracks Binance Futures liquidations, stop-hunts, and CVD anomalies millisecond-by-millisecond.

I got tired of delayed REST APIs while trading, so I built a direct WebSocket pipeline. Just did a 100% cold launch without a marketing budget to test the waters, and now pivoting hard into technical SEO & dev community feedback.

Check out the live landing & docs at sigma-liq [dot] fun — would love your technical feedback on the architecture!

I built a pre-purchase wardrobe advisor after wasting way too much money on clothes that didn't match anything I owned

I kept doing this thing where I'd impulse-buy something, get home, and realize it didn't go with anything in my closet. Turns out this is a bigger problem than just me: online apparel return rates are 30-40%, mostly from size/style mismatch, not defects.

So I'm building Atayr — snap a photo of something before you buy it, and it shows you how it pairs with what you already own. Second part: a lot of clothes only get worn once (weddings, interviews, one-off events) — so I'm adding a feature where you can share your wardrobe with trusted friends and borrow instead of buying for those one-time things.

Right now it's just a landing page + waitlist — trying to validate demand before I actually build the app (bootstrapped, so being careful not to build something nobody wants).

Would genuinely appreciate feedback — is this a problem you've run into? What would make you actually use something like this vs. not bother?

if you want to see it / join the list. (atayr . site) remove the space

Great idea, definitely helpful for solo founders and builders. I would like to participate.

I'm @pablores on X, and I'm building MixScout, an artist discovery + CRM platform for mix engineers and producers.

Great tool! I also just launched a free AI tool for LinkedIn. DM if you want feedback swap.

Love this idea. Giving founders a chance to talk about what they’re actually building, share the journey behind it, and get real-time questions from an audience feels much more valuable than another polished pitch or demo. Looking forward to seeing how this comes together!

Love this concept! I'm building SoftRankings, a stage-aware directory that helps founders and growing teams find tools that fit their exact stage, budget, and use case without the enterprise noise.

Would love to jump on the live pitch, share how we're helping early tools get discovered, and get direct feedback from the community! 🚀

Product: SoftRankings
Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/company/softrankings

@MHDehalvi146 — QUORVA is a practical toolkit for social media freelancers that helps turn client goals into content plans, ideas, and creatives, reducing the hours spent on repetitive content work.

https://darling-fenglisu-90f358.netlify.app

The thing I’d watch with this format is that a good pitch can create attention without creating understanding.

2–5 minutes is enough to make someone curious, but probably not enough to overcome a vague positioning statement—especially when several products are being pitched back-to-back. The audience may remember the founder or the demo without remembering exactly who the product is for and why they should care.

I’d actually make the one-sentence description the hardest part of the application. If a founder can’t make the value obvious there, more distribution probably just amplifies the ambiguity.

here to answer anything

This comment was deleted 15 days ago