Software gets versioned. Knowledge just rots. AIMD fixes that.
A while back I was learning Haskell.
Not "watch a YouTube tutorial" learning. Actual learning — books, deep dives, the real stuff.
And almost everything I found was dead. Blogs abandoned mid-series. Repos nobody touched since 2016. Forum threads where the answer references a library version that doesn't even exist anymore. Books written once and never updated again because the author had zero reason to.
Nothing wrong with Haskell. The knowledge just had no lifecycle. Nobody's paid to keep it alive, nobody versions it, nobody maintains it — so it just decays, quietly, the same way almost every niche technical topic eventually does. You don't notice until you're the one stuck digging through the wreckage at 1am trying to figure out why a tutorial from 2014 doesn't work anymore.
That pissed me off enough that I stopped complaining and built the fix.
AIMD gives knowledge what software has always had — a lifecycle.
Versioned. Licensed. Maintained. Worth something.
16 asset types. Not "upload a PDF and hope." Notes, SOPs, worksheets, code architectures, workflows, rulesets — real structure for whatever kind of knowledge you're sitting on.
Workspaces that do everything, A to Z. Team whitelists locked to verified company domains. Shared context across every asset you're maintaining. Built to be where knowledge actually lives and gets worked on — not a folder you dump files into and forget.
DRM built into the workspace, not bolted on top. A secrets vault so API keys decrypt only in-memory, during the run, never touching disk. Hardware-locked license seats. An autoshield that kills a session the instant it smells concurrent-IP abuse. This isn't a plugin — it's how the workspace is built from the ground up.
Markdown that actually does something. Docs on AIMD aren't dead text — they run. Drop a {{variable}} in and it auto-compiles into a real input form. You're not reading a doc, you're executing one.
Your source never leaves the building. Buyers test everything sandboxed, through token fallback. They see the output. They never see your files.
Real versioning, real forking. Every asset carries semantic versions like actual software. Fork someone's work, build on it openly, and the lineage stays intact — nothing here is a silent copy-paste.
Remix payouts that flow uphill. Fork something and build a business on top of it? 15% flows back to the original creator automatically. Forever. Not "hope they credit you."
Communities around the knowledge itself. Not a generic comment section — spaces built around specific assets and topics, so the people maintaining and using the same knowledge actually find each other.
Custom memberships, Patreon-style. Creators set up their own recurring tiers. You're not stuck picking between "sell once" and "give it away" — you can build actual ongoing support around your work.
A CLI built like git, not like a toy. Push revisions. Lock branches with lease locking so two people don't stomp on each other. Tag real semantic versions. Publish from the terminal like it's actual software — because it is.
Knowledge should compound the way code does. Right now it doesn't. That's the whole bet.
If you've ever built something real in a niche corner of a field and watched the "definitive resource" for it slowly rot into uselessness — this is for you.
Tell me where I'm wrong:
Does "knowledge has no lifecycle" land, or does it sound like a slogan?
The self-executing markdown thing — does that make sense written down, or do you need to see it run?
Would hardware-locked DRM + a secrets vault actually get you to publish something you'd normally keep to yourself?
I'll answer anything. Architecture, CLI internals, the economics, all of it.
