Home
Starting Up
Case Studies DB
Products
Ideas DB
Vibe Coding Tools
Subscribe to IH+
Starting Up
Case Studies
Ideas DB
Products DB
Sign in
Join
14
Likes
14
Comments
Time to ditch your password and go with passwordless authentication
by
Aesop
https://zitadel.com/blog/passwordless
I'm still shocked that another one of these comes out almost every day. The core problem with this one is the uptime, 99.5% is going to be a challenge. I know the other planes get higher, but are they enough? What user management system is okay for anything less than 3-nines.
When we wrote ours, Authress, our customers kept coming back to us saying we need your AuthN and authZ solution to be 4-nines. So ours is 5-nines, and it's just as cheap at the lowest level. There are so many things that are table-stakes in this arena, you need to offer all them to be a real competitor.
Hi There, Co-founder here.
We certainly offer higher SLA's, I guess thats what you are refering as uptime. 99.5% is just where the journey starts for paying customers.
Besides that, I dont think there are so many OSS IAM solutions who come out everyday ;-)
Especially if you think of some of the USPs ZITADEL provides:
Btw. as I see you are only roughly 50Km apart from us we are open to grab a few beers and talk about the challenges while building a SaaS product.
Cheers
:wave:
In Internxt, we are slowly transitioning to a passwordless system by using multifactor authentication solutions and security keys, it helps our team to deliver an outstanding customer experiences without worrying about cybersecurity issues. If you only use a password to authenticate a user, it leaves a trace for a cyberattack.
If the password is weak or was exposed elsewhere, how do you know if it is actually the user signing in with the credentials and not an attacker. By requiring a second form of authentication, you increase security. The additional factor is not easy for an attacker to obtain or duplicate. MFA and Security keys are the easiest most cost effective cyber security solution in our industry.
Passwordless authentication reduces the burden on your IT staff by minimizing or eliminating password reset requests and decreases the risks of cyberattacks.
One thing to highlight is that I think most people are confused about passwordless authentication, especially Biometric authentication.
Websites won't have access to your face or fingerprints, nor will government organizations. Unlike passwords, your fingerprints are not stored everywhere, or shared with everyone. Your fingerprints can be safely removed from your device at any time of your choosing.
It is because it uses private/public keys exchanges to validate your biometric login with your choice of authenticator device (phones, laptops, etc...), to verify your identity and allow you access to resources.
Are there any benefits (beyond convenience) to passwordless authentication?
If you rely on FIDO2 you get a phishing resistance.
This works in the way that your browser in conjunction with the authenticator will store and verify the domain name (based on TLS) of the authentication target.
What you don't get is a "proper" MitM protection as with mTLS (X509 Client Certs)
Basically not prone to security problems like passwords leaks, hacks, reuse across sites etc... The top 3 passwordless are methods are FIDO2 (keys), Device centric (Biometric, FaceID on phones), and Magic link (As secure as your email provider).
"60% of large and global enterprises and 90% of midsize enterprises will implement passwordless methods in more than 50% of use cases by the end of 2022." Presumably because of the associated cost?
I assume so, that would make sense. It says "While the implementation of passwordless might seem expensive at first glance, its price does not even come close to the fines and losses incurred due to a cyber-attack." So, it's almost like insurance. You pay money for something you hope you won't need to protect yourself in the event that something bad happens (in this case, getting cyber-attacked and paying the associated fines and losses).
Except this doesn't necessarily guarantee you won't get cyber-attacked. You could pay the additional cost associated with setting up passwordless authentication methods and still have to pay the fines and costs following a cyber attack. So, it's not so much like insurance...unless it's insurance that doesn't cover you for anything in the event the 'unwanted event' occurs. It's more of a preventative measure - supposedly, it reduces the risk of a cyber-attack. Plus, I think a major benefit is the fact it makes for a more convenient user experience.
Mmm. Convenient.... I don't know what to say, but is convenient for some and for others not that much if you are doing passwordless by sending a link to mailbox.
Personally I find it annoying to the point of procrastinating to login to a site or app...
There's loads of factors that have to be checked before having a superb UX that are only controllable by the user...
This comment was deleted 4 years ago