4
5 Comments

Very First Iteration. Feedback Appreciated

I've been building Intrati. Video calls from your web browser (mobile or desktop).

I do not see Intrati as a replacement for established services such as Whereby or Joinme, yet. I want to see how possible is to work with WebRTC to create something like this that could be useful and profitable.

This is the very first version of this service/tool that only includes:

  • Video/voice room calls from a web browser
  • Up to 4 participants per room

In the future I plan to add:

  • Chat
  • Screen sharing

Please, give it a try and let me know how it goes.

Intrati -> https://intrati.devaspros.com/

Thanks a lot :D

on May 30, 2020
  1. 4

    Hey Francisco, a couple thoughts:

    I've used probably 20 free video call products. I would suggest that you edit your post (in here) to give us a couple compelling reasons to opt for your's. Native screensharing? This is de riguer. Those without that are probably quick slap-ups, done with webRTC.

    How many ppl to a call? What's the split on user resources/host resources?

    See what I mean? Give us reasons to use Intrati, understanding that we know what's out there.

    Best of luck with it!

    1. 2

      Hi @osakasaul thanks for your comment.

      As the title says "Very first iteration", this is really a very first iteration :D

      I mean, I understand your point but right now there's a lot of questions for this tool/service I'm working on.

      I'll be adding more details to the description about the feature set for Intrati. however, I do wonder what you mean by "Native screensharing". What's a service the doesn't do "native screensharing"? Could you please expand a bit more?

      Again, thanks a lot!

      1. 2

        Google Meet, Skype, Amazon's Echo Show, Gotomeeting, Zoom: all have native screensharing.

        "Native" screensharing: people are not expected to install a browser extension for no purpose other than the screensharing feature for a single product/site. I can tell you that most people will not install a browser extension that has such a limited use case. Anything using webRTC for videocalls will need users to get screensharing by way of a browser extension.

        I hope this helps.

        1. 2

          Thanks! I see your point. Let me tell you that I do plan to add "native" screensharing.

          Your comments have been very useful. They did help me.

    2. 2

      Great questions!