Vibe coding is on fire
I have build an SaaS for me, which is basically a lead generation product. I am completely new at coding, but with the help of AI editors like Cursor and Claude Code, I was able to build the complete product from scratch.
I have build an SaaS for me, which is basically a lead generation product. I am completely new at coding, but with the help of AI editors like Cursor and Claude Code, I was able to build the complete product from scratch.
Vibe coding definitely resonates as a way to get something visible quickly, but the real test for developers is whether that “vibe moment” leads to trustable, repeatable code rather than just a cool prototype.
From an engineering perspective, one of the clearer trade-offs I see is between initial exploratory velocity and long-term maintainability — especially when it comes to tests, type safety, and predictable builds.
Curious — in your view, what metric or signal separates good “vibe code” that evolves into real product from vibe code that ends up being technical debt (e.g., test coverage, refactor cycles, or production incidents)? That’s usually the distinction that matters in real dev workflows.