You built it with Lovable. Now what?
Lovable gets you from idea to working product faster than anything else out there. I've seen founders ship in a weekend what used to take months.
But then comes the part Lovable doesn't cover: the launch.
And that's where most of them stall.
Not because they don't know they need to post on Product Hunt, or write a Show HN, or find the right subreddits. They know. The problem is everything that comes after knowing:
Which subreddits actually allow this kind of post — and which ones will silently remove it
What to write for each channel that doesn't sound like a product announcement
Which directories are worth submitting to and which are dead
Whether any of it actually went live — or just looks live when you're logged in as the author
I built Zarek to handle exactly this.
Paste your product URL. Zarek reads it, builds a full 6-phase launch roadmap, and writes every piece of copy — X thread, Show HN, LinkedIn, Reddit, Product Hunt. It finds the right subreddits and directories for your specific product, pre-screens each one for rules and constraints before writing the pitch, submits directories automatically, and then verifies every listing is actually live.
Then it emails you a daily briefing for the duration of the launch window: here's what's done, here's what needs attention, here's what to do today.
If you've shipped something with Lovable and the launch is the part you're dreading — Zarek is built for you.
Try it at https://track.zarek.tech/t/XTGwkuA0. Paste your URL and see what comes back.
Happy to hear from anyone who's been through this. What was the hardest part of your launch after the build?
The "who is this NOT for" line is genuinely one of the most underused copy moves, it immediately makes the rest of the page more credible because it signals you're not trying to be everything to everyone.
Quick observation on Zarek itself: a launch coach that struggled with its own launch copy is actually a compelling origin story, the cobbler's shoes problem. That tension is more honest and more interesting than most SaaS homepages.
Is your hero leading with that story or with the product features? Because the story converts better.
I'm a SaaS copywriter, I'd love to do a quick audit of zarek.tech if you're open to it. Free, no strings.
Right now the hero leads with product outcome ("Zarek writes your launch. You press send.") rather than the founder origin story, though we weave the backstory into our community posts.
Feel free to send over your notes whenever you have a moment. Thank you.
This is awesome!!! Thank you. Just running through it now and the first 5 suggestions are exactly what I set up the other day but it did require me running prompts in 2 different chatbots to clarify so interested to see how this roadmap takes me.
That's exactly the problem Zarek is built to solve — what currently takes you 2 chatbots and a round of clarifying prompts should happen in one flow, automatically. The roadmap reads your product URL and writes every piece of copy inline, so you're not context-switching between tools.
Would love to see how it holds up against what you've already set up. Give it a run at zarek.tech and send any feedback to wangc2016217@gmail.com — genuinely want to know where it nails it and where it falls short.
I will do, thanks so much!
Your sharpest feature is buried at the bottom: "verifies every listing is actually live, not just looks live when you're logged in as author." Almost nobody solves that. Launch copy is crowded, every AI tool does it now. But "did my Reddit post stay up or get silently removed" keeps founders refreshing for days. Lead with verification, not copy. Copy is table stakes; proof-it-went-live is the wedge.
Gently: tying this to Lovable shrinks your market. The launch problem isn't Lovable-specific. "Built it with Lovable" makes a hand-coding founder assume it's not for them. "You built it. Now what?" catches everyone the headline excludes.
Hardest part of my launches was that exact thing: never knowing if a post landed or quietly died. What made you build verification?
You're right, and this is the most useful piece of feedback I've gotten on positioning.
Verification is the wedge. Copy is expected now — every founder assumes an AI can write a Reddit post. Nobody assumes anything actually confirms the post stayed up, the directory listing resolved, the Show HN didn't get flagged. That's the thing that keeps people refreshing at 2am and I buried it.
The Lovable note is also correct. "Built with Lovable" was a context signal for one community, not a positioning anchor. It's already gone from the main framing.
To your question — verification came from watching a beta user submit to 12 directories over a weekend, then discover three weeks later that four of them either failed silently or went live with broken formatting. The submission felt done. It wasn't. That gap between "I submitted it" and "it's actually live and correct" is where the real time gets lost, and no tool was closing it.
That's the thing Zarek has to own.
https://zarek.tech | wangc2016217@gmail.com