
Aerca
Stop stressing about your agency's cash flow.
Even though my marketing strategy currently sucks, there is one thing I actually did right: validating the idea before writing any code. I spent a month just reading industry reports and forum complaints before ever opening my code editor.
If you are trying to figure out what to build next, here is a 4-step framework you can follow to validate your idea using free data:
1. Find the "Contradictory Pain" in the data
If you want a good B2B idea, look for contradictions in industry reports. Don't look for things that make sense; look for things that don't.
Example: When I read financial reports on SMBs, I found that 94% of growing agency owners are highly confident they will grow this year, but 54% of them have less than 31 days of cash in the bank. How you can apply this: Look at reports in your target industry. If you find a massive contradiction (like "growing rapidly" but "completely broke"), that paradox is where your product opportunity lives.
2. Follow the pain to the root cause
Once you find the paradox, you have to dig into the data to find the actual leak.
Example: I found data showing that 30% of agency owners actually delay their own paychecks to make payroll. Why? Because manual billing causes invoices to sit 39 days past due. Automating it drops that to 18 days. How you can apply this: Don't just build a tool for the surface-level problem. Find the exact gap (like that 21-day delay) that is causing the founder to lose sleep, and build a feature specifically to close that exact gap.
3. Build to fix the human problem, not the tech problem
The next step is reading through public forums (like Reddit or Indie Hackers) to understand the psychology behind the data.
Example: Why do those invoices sit for 39 days? How you can apply this: The real problem is usually human nature, not bad software. You shouldn't just build a tool that does a task faster. You need to build a tool that removes a painful, awkward social interaction for the user.
4. Talk to exactly 3 people who face the problem
Once you have the data and understand the psychology, you have to talk to real human beings to confirm your theory.
Example: Before I wrote any code, I reached out to a few agency owners online just to ask them if this "profitable but broke" phase was real. Connecting with just 3 people who confirmed that this was a bleeding-neck problem for them gave me the ultimate green light to start coding. (Of course, shortly after that, Reddit permanently banned me for self-promotion. But hey, at least I got the validation first!)
How you can apply this: Don't build in a vacuum. Once you form your hypothesis, find 3 people in your target market and simply ask them if they experience the exact problem you researched. If they say yes, start coding. If they say no, go back to step 1.
Doing this deep-dive research gave me absolute clarity on exactly what to build. Now, if only it taught me how to actually sell it...
For the last two weeks, I’ve been locked in my code editor.
Then today happened, and I was violently humbled.
The Wall: Distribution.
I’ve realized the hard way that building the product is only 10% of the battle. Making it visible to actual agencies is the other 90%, and my marketing skills are currently hovering somewhere between "non-existent" and "active liability."
I have absolutely zero network. So, I decided to put on my "hustler" hat and do some organic outreach on Reddit to connect with agency owners. I was ready to drop some value, get some feedback, and ride off into the sunset with my first 5 users.
Guess what actually happened?
Within an hour, the anti-spam bots descended upon me like I owed them money. They instantly sniped my posts and permanently banned my main Reddit account for "self-promotion."
It is the most frustrating, yet hilarious, feeling ever. I know exactly who my Ideal Customer Profile is. I know
Aerca solves a massive cash-flow problem for them. But right now, I'm literally just a 16-year-old solo founder sitting in a dark room, getting absolutely manhandled by Reddit spam filters while trying to talk to adults.
What I actually need
I realized today that I cannot do this alone. I am a builder, not a marketer. My marketing strategy is officially a public hazard.
I am actively looking for a hungry GTM/Sales Co-Founder to partner with me. I don't want a freelancer; I want a true partner for a substantial equity split. I need someone who actually knows how to distribute B2B SaaS to SMBs, and who can completely own customer acquisition while I stay safely confined to my code editor where I belong.
Despite getting bullied by algorithms today, I have never been more confident in the product itself. The two agency owners I did manage to talk to before I was nuked off the platform confirmed that this is a bleeding-neck problem.
I basically built a massive weapon I just need someone who knows how to aim it.
If you are a growth operator looking for a technical founder who will literally never stop coding, shoot me a DM.
Let's build this together.
(And for the veteran founders here, besides crying, how do you handle the mental toll of failing at marketing? Any advice is welcome).
Cheers,
1 Like
Comment
I’ve been doing a ton of research into the service business and agency space lately because I’m looking for a serious problem to solve with software.
While looking into it, I started reading through financial reports from London Economics, Relay Financial, and
Sage. I kept coming across this insane paradox where agencies look incredibly profitable on their P&L, but the founders are actually struggling with cash flow and panicking about payroll.
To give you an idea of what this looks like, the Relay survey found that 94% of growing SMB owners are highly confident they will grow this year. But 54% of those exact same businesses have less than 31 days of cash sitting in the bank.
The Bluevine data was even more surprising. They found that almost 30% of owners have actually delayed their own paychecks just so their team can get paid on time.
It turns out the biggest leak is just in the follow-ups. Sage data showed that if you use manual billing, your invoices sit for about 39 days past due. But if you automate it, that wait drops to 18 days.
That 21-day gap is literally the difference between making payroll easily and sweating at 11pm. Because founders are naturally too polite to send aggressive reminder emails, they just end up acting like a free bank for their clients.
The scale of this is huge. A UK government study found that late payments cause a £11 billion loss every year.
Roughly 14,000 businesses close annually just because of this, not because they have bad products, but because they run out of cash waiting for money they already earned.
I feel like this is a massive gap in the market. We have project management tools and accounting software, but nobody is actually fixing this 21-day gap.
I'm building an autonomous AI finance Co-pilot that act as the missing finance team more service business miss out.
Do you guys think this is a painful enough problem to build a SaaS around? Anyone here run an agency and actually deal with this "profitable but broke" phase?
4 Likes
Comment
Hey everyone, Posted here for the first time yesterday. Today was a lot.
I found CentSight and spent an hour convinced I was dead. While doing my usual research this morning I came across a company called CentSight. "AI CFO for SMBs." My twin pitch. I went cold.
I went deep on them immediately. CentSight launched two weeks ago on June 24th. They raised a $1.5M pre-seed from Mudita Venture Partners, a venture studio, meaning they co-built the product alongside the founder. The founder is a serious operator who previously built and sold a recruiting software company. Not a first-time founder. Not a side project. Real company, real money, real experience. I genuinely thought I was finished before I had started. Then I actually read what they built.
CentSight connects to QuickBooks and Plaid. Their entire product lives on the ledger. Settled transactions. Historical data. They explicitly market "read-only" access as a security feature, which means they are architecturally locked out of doing anything upstream, no time tracker integration, no scope creep detection, no change order drafting, no invoice follow-ups. They analyze money that has already leaked. They are a rear-view mirror dressed up as an AI. That is not what Aerca is.
Aerca lives before the invoice. It catches the leaks while the work is still happening. It drafts the uncomfortable email to the client before the month ends and the margin is already gone. CentSight cannot do any of that without dismantling their entire product identity.
I went from panicking to being genuinely energized within an hour. A team with a veteran founder and $1.5M in funding just proved that agency owners will pay for financial AI. And they left the entire pre-invoice space completely untouched. Then I got my first real inbound.
Somewhere in the middle of all this, I noticed an email sitting in my inbox from the Aerca contact form. A user who found the site through IndieHackers, wrote in to say the messaging resonated, and then asked a specific, detailed question about the product.
Not "what does this do?" A specific, product-level question. From a stranger. From the post I wrote yesterday. That told me the pain is real. I replied the same day. The part I keep thinking about.
The biggest thing I realized today is not about CentSight. It is about distribution.
Right now Aerca exists in a vacuum. The site is live. The messaging is sharp. The landing page looks serious. But I am a 16-year-old developer in India with no audience, no network in this space, and no budget for ads. If I just keep building and don't actively fight for discoverability, nobody will ever find it. CentSight has a venture studio's design team, a founder with an existing network from his last exit, and $1.5M to make noise. I have IndieHackers, a GitHub account, and whatever time I have between school.
So the next two weeks are not about building more features. They are about making Aerca a product people can actually stumble across, not something that sits perfectly designed in a dark room.
The plan: build a BYOK (Bring Your Own Key) open-source MVP and publish it on GitHub. No cloud, no database, no data stored anywhere. You clone it, plug in your own OpenAI or Claude API key, upload your timesheet and contract data, and within minutes it shows you exactly where your margin is bleeding and drafts the emails to recover it. Open source means discoverable.
Developers find GitHub. Agency owners trust code they can read. CentSight spent $1.5M to prove the market is real. I am going to spend 48 hours proving the gap they left behind with a GitHub repo and a README.
Two things.
If you run an agency or know someone who does, forward this post or introduce me. I don't have a network in this space yet and I am genuinely trying to find the people who feel this problem every single month. One warm intro is worth more than a thousand impressions right now.
And if you are an agency owner yourself, follow the build. I will keep posting updates here as I go. I need brutal, honest feedback from people who actually run service businesses. Not encouragement. Tell me where I am wrong.
One question before I go:
A 16-year-old developer with no funding, no network, and no team is building against a veteran founder with a prior exit and $1.5M in institutional backing.
Do you think that is a problem? Or do you think the person closest to the code and furthest from the corporate playbook actually has an advantage here?
Genuinely asking. Drop it in the comments.
3 Likes
Comment
Hey everyone,
I’m a 16-year-old developer from India. My background is mostly in applied ML and complex systems architecture, but recently I decided I wanted to stop just writing code and actually solve a hard business problem.
I spent the last month studying the economics of service businesses—specifically dev, design, and marketing agencies. What I found was a terrifying paradox: Most agencies are profitable on paper, but broke in the bank.
I read through hundreds of forums and surveys, and the same story kept popping up. An agency owner sells a $10,000 project. The client asks for "one small extra thing." The owner says yes to protect the relationship. Then it happens again. By the end of the project, their 28% profit margin has collapsed to 11% due to unbilled scope creep.
Then, they send the invoice and wait 60 days to get paid, while their own payroll hits on Friday. Surveys show 30% of SMB owners delay paying their own salaries just to make payroll because of this exact cash flow gap.
The real problem isn't technical. It’s psychological. Founders surrender their margin because they dread the awkward "money conversation" with their best clients. They would rather work for free than act like a debt collector.
Every financial tool on the market today (QuickBooks, AR automation) only works after the invoice is sent. They are just chasing money that has already leaked.
So, I am building Aerca.
Aerca is an autonomous finance operator that sits upstream. It connects your QuickBooks, time tracker, and project management tools to give you a live, forward looking view of your cash. Instead of just recording history, it acts in real-time: it finds delivered work you forgot to invoice, it flags scope creep before it eats your margin, and it predicts your exact cash runway so you know exactly what is safe to spend this week.
My Ask:
I know how to build the architecture, but I need your help with two things:
1. Am I right? If you run a service business or an agency, do you actually feel this "profitable but broke" pain? Or am I totally wrong? Please validate this for me in the comments!
2. Pilot Partners: If this is a bleeding-neck problem for you, I am looking for a few founding agencies to pilot this with so I can build it exactly to your workflow.
Check out the site here: https://aerca.vercel.app/
If the messaging hits home, please reserve a founding spot or drop a comment below. I'd love to jump on a 15-minute call and show you what I'm building.
Thanks for reading!
3 Likes
7 Comments
7 Comments
-
2
What stood out to me is that you're optimizing for awareness instead of automation.
A lot of finance apps promise to remove the work. You're asking users to stay consciously involved with their spending. For people who care more about changing behavior than syncing accounts, that's a very different value proposition.
-
1
Thanks for the thoughtful feedback Aryan, you nailed it, I have a completely different motto than the standard apps that just promise to blindly 'remove the work.'
You are absolutely right that founders need to stay consciously involved and hyper-aware of their daily cash flow and profits in order to survive.
The ultimate goal with Aerca is to give those founders the automated power of a enterprise finance team, without them ever losing that crucial info about their money.
-
1
Interesting.
Your reply made me think less about financial awareness itself and more about what it means to automate capability without automating responsibility.
I don't think I can explain why that distinction becomes much more important as the product grows without flattening the reasoning in a thread.
If you're open to it, what's the best email to reach you on?
-
-
-
1
The "profitable on paper, broke in the bank" framing matches what shows up in the actual survey data too — Ignition's 2025 agency pricing report found 57% of agencies lose $1-5k/month to scope creep they never end up billing for. So the pain is real and it's documented, not just anecdotal. Where I'd push on the framing a bit: the psychological piece you mention — founders avoiding the money conversation — seems like the actual root cause more than the tooling gap. A live cash view helps you see the leak, but it doesn't make the deposit-ask or the change-order conversation less awkward. Curious whether Aerca is planning to touch that behavioral side at all, or staying purely on the visibility/detection layer.
-
1
Yeah, totally agree. Aerca is not just meant to show the numbers. It also focuses on the psychological side, because a lot of founders already know they should follow up or ask for a change order, but it feels uncomfortable.
The idea is that Aerca analyzes what’s happening, catches it at the right time, and writes the follow-up or client email for you. The founder still stays in control and approves it before anything goes out, but they don’t have to start the awkward money conversation from zero. Its just they read and approve thats all
-
About
Agencies bleed margin to unbilled scope creep and late payments.I wanted to fix the "profitable but broke" paradox keeping 30% of owners from making payroll. That's why I'm building Aerca to become their finance operator



Comment