Aura++
Launch your project and increase online aura
I've noticed this pattern with indie projects:
Weeks or months go into building the product.
Then launch day arrives and the distribution plan is basically:
"I'll post it on Product Hunt and Twitter."
I've done enough research into launch platforms to realize how incomplete that approach can be.
There isn't really one "best" place to launch.
It depends on what you're trying to accomplish.
For a developer tool, you might care about reaching developers who can actually use the product.
For a B2B SaaS, relevant buyers may matter more than raw traffic.
For an unfinished product, getting 20 useful beta users may be more valuable than getting 2,000 random visitors.
For SEO, an evergreen listing might be more valuable six months from now than a launch-day spike.
That's why I built Best Launch Platforms — a research project that compares 70+ launch and product discovery channels.
I'm trying to look at launch platforms through a few different lenses:
Reach — how much potential exposure is there?
Intent — are people actually looking for products?
Fairness — can a small/new project realistically get visibility?
Evergreen value — does the listing continue to matter after launch day?
AI visibility — can the platform contribute to discovery through AI/answer engines?
Ease — how much effort does it take to get listed or launch?
The interesting part isn't the ranking itself.
It's seeing how different the "best" platform becomes depending on the job you're trying to get done.
Would love to hear from other builders:
When you've launched something, how did you decide where to launch it?
Gut feeling? Previous experience? Audience overlap? A spreadsheet? Or did you just post everywhere and see what happened?
For years, startup launches followed a familiar formula:
Build the product.
Prepare the launch page.
Submit it to [Product Hunt].
Share the link on social media.
Wait for the traffic.
That strategy can still work. Product Hunt remains one of the largest and most recognizable product-discovery communities, and its own launch guide highlights distribution, feedback, validation, customers, social proof and networking as major reasons founders launch there.
But there is a problem with treating a launch as a single event:
Your product doesn't stop existing after launch day.
Neither should your distribution.
In 2026, a stronger launch strategy is to treat a product launch as a multi-stage discoverability campaign involving launch communities, niche audiences, evergreen directories, content and search.
The question isn't:
“Where should I launch my startup?”
It's:
“How can I turn one launch into weeks or months of discoverability?”
The launch-day mindset is outdated
A startup can spend months building a product and then concentrate almost all of its marketing activity into a 24-hour period.
That creates a strange imbalance.
You might have:
Months of product development
Weeks of launch preparation
Hundreds of hours of engineering
Dozens of marketing assets
…and then one day where everyone is expected to notice.
Even Product Hunt's own guidance emphasizes that founders should define measurable goals beyond simply reaching Product of the Day. Those goals can include traffic, leads, customers, feedback, networking and brand recognition.
That suggests an important principle:
A successful launch isn't necessarily the launch with the most upvotes.
It is the launch that creates the most useful business outcomes.
Think in launch layers, not launch websites
A modern launch strategy can be divided into four layers.
Layer 1: Launch-day attention
This is where platforms such as [Product Hunt] are strongest.
Layer 2: Audience-specific discovery
This is where platforms such as [EarlyHunt], [IndieHunt], [MakerHunt] and [SideHunt] can complement a broader launch.
Layer 3: Evergreen discovery
This includes directories such as [Uno Directory] and relevant niche directories.
Layer 4: Long-term content and search
This is where persistent product pages, launch stories, editorial content and SEO become important.
Instead of asking one platform to accomplish everything, give each channel a specific job.
Stage 1: Create a major launch moment
For many technology startups, [Product Hunt] remains a logical place to create the main launch event.
Product Hunt operates as a community where products are submitted daily and users can discover, upvote, comment on and share products. Its homepage leaderboard changes throughout the day based on factors including votes, comments and timing.
But founders should prepare before launch.
Product Hunt currently recommends that new users familiarize themselves with the community before posting and says new accounts need to complete onboarding before they can post. It recommends building a presence well ahead of launch.
What Product Hunt should accomplish
Your Product Hunt launch should primarily focus on:
Awareness
Feedback
Early adopters
Social proof
Community engagement
Launch-day traffic
Don't make the mistake of measuring the entire campaign by your leaderboard position.
A product can have a successful launch without winning Product of the Day.
Stage 2: Don't let the launch disappear
After the major launch, the next objective should be continued discovery.
This is where [Aura++] can play a different role from a traditional one-day launch.
Aura++ combines product launches with persistent product pages, launch stories, badges, comments, rankings, Hall of Fame exposure and additional distribution. Its current launch guide positions Aura++ as the primary hub of a wider launch network.
The platform's own guide recommends:
one strong primary hub plus timed amplifiers
rather than submitting to dozens of directories simultaneously.
That is an important distinction.
The goal isn't:
“Get listed everywhere.”
The goal is:
“Create a coordinated distribution sequence.”
What Aura++ can add
A second launch surface can give your startup another opportunity to communicate:
What the product does
Who it is for
Why it exists
What makes it different
What you've learned
How people can try it
That content can remain useful after the initial launch spike.
Stage 3: Go where your specific audience already hangs out
A startup doesn't have one universal audience.
An AI developer tool and a consumer productivity app may both be software products, but they shouldn't necessarily use the exact same distribution strategy.
This is where specialized launch communities become useful.
EarlyHunt: AI and digital products
[EarlyHunt] positions itself as a weekly launch platform for AI products and digital tools, with community voting, launch coverage and SEO-oriented features.
If you're launching:
AI SaaS
Developer tools
AI agents
Productivity software
Digital products
EarlyHunt can be a logical second-wave launch.
IndieHunt: indie makers and AI
[IndieHunt] focuses on indie and AI product launches and a builder-oriented audience.
This makes it particularly relevant to:
Solo founders
Bootstrapped SaaS
Indie hackers
AI products
Products built in public
The story matters here.
“Three-person startup launches AI platform” and “solo founder built an AI product after work” are very different narratives.
The second naturally fits an indie-maker community.
MakerHunt: makers and builders
[MakerHunt] is oriented toward makers and builders shipping products.
That makes it a natural fit for:
Developer tools
Small SaaS products
AI utilities
Open-source projects
Products built in public
Rather than competing with Product Hunt for the same broad audience, it can provide another, more focused audience layer.
SideHunt: MVPs and side projects
[SideHunt] focuses on side projects, MVPs and smaller indie launches.
This is particularly useful for founders who haven't built a venture-backed company yet.
A weekend project doesn't need to pretend it's the next billion-dollar startup.
It needs to find the people who understand why the project is interesting.
Stage 4: Add evergreen discovery
Launch communities are excellent for attention.
Directories can provide something different:
ongoing discovery.
[Uno Directory] is positioned as an evergreen directory for productivity, creative and business tools.
That means you can think about directory listings differently from launch platforms.
A launch platform answers:
“What's new?”
An evergreen directory answers:
“What tools exist for this problem?”
Both questions matter.
The overlooked opportunity: content
A product launch shouldn't end with a launch page.
Turn the launch into content.
For example:
Before launch
“Why we built [Product]”
Launch day
“We just launched [Product]”
Week 1
“What we learned from our first 100 users”
Week 2
“How we built [Product]”
Month 1
“30 days after launching: what worked and what didn't”
Now one product launch has become a content engine.
Each piece can target a different search intent.
Don't publish the same announcement everywhere
This is one of the most important rules of multi-platform distribution.
Don't copy and paste:
“We're excited to announce the launch of our amazing new AI-powered platform…”
onto ten different websites.
Instead, adapt the story.
PlatformContent angleProduct HuntWhat's new + why people should try itAura++Product story + value propositionEarlyHuntAI/technology angleIndieHuntFounder/building journeyMakerHuntHow it was builtSideHuntMVP/side-project storyUno DirectoryWhat the tool doesHacker NewsTechnical insight
Now every submission has a reason to exist.
A better 30-day launch strategy
Here's a practical example.
Days -14 to -7: Preparation
Prepare:
Product screenshots
Demo video/GIF
Product description
Founder story
Analytics
Launch graphics
Social posts
Customer testimonials
Email announcement
Product Hunt recommends preparing launch materials ahead of time and setting measurable goals rather than focusing exclusively on ranking.
Day 0: Main launch
Product Hunt
Focus on:
attention + feedback + early users
Don't ask people to blindly upvote.
Product Hunt explicitly prohibits directly asking people to upvote and warns against paid voting or traffic manipulation.
Days 2–7: Second distribution wave
Aura++
Create another strong product/discovery surface.
Focus on:
Product story
Differentiation
Screenshots
Customer problem
Founder story
Long-term discoverability
Days 7–14: Niche audiences
Choose the most relevant:
AI
[EarlyHunt] + [IndieHunt]
Indie SaaS
[IndieHunt] + [MakerHunt]
Side project
[SideHunt] + [MakerHunt]
General SaaS
[Uneed] + [Aura++]
Days 14–21: Evergreen listings
Add:
[Uno Directory]
plus relevant niche directories.
Days 21–30: Turn launch results into content
Now publish:
What we learned
User feedback
Product updates
Customer stories
Technical breakdown
Launch results
At this point, your launch isn't over.
It's generating a second wave of content.
What about backlinks?
Backlinks can be useful, but they shouldn't be the only reason you launch somewhere.
A better framework is:
Audience + relevance + traffic + discoverability + authority
rather than:
“Does this website give me a dofollow link?”
A backlink from a relevant page can be useful, but a relevant customer is worth substantially more than an arbitrary SEO metric.
The same principle applies to domain-authority metrics.
Don't build a launch strategy around collecting numbers.
Build it around reaching people.
How to measure whether a launch actually worked
Instead of reporting:
“We got 400 upvotes!”
measure the full funnel.
Awareness
Impressions
Brand searches
Social mentions
Traffic
Referral sessions
Organic traffic
Direct traffic
Acquisition
Signups
Trials
Demo requests
Activation
Activated users
Key product actions
Trial-to-paid conversion
Business
Customers
Revenue
Partnerships
Qualified leads
Long-term
Organic search growth
Branded search growth
Returning visitors
Content performance
This gives you a much more accurate picture of launch ROI.
The launch stack I would use
For a typical AI or SaaS startup, I'd structure the campaign like this:
Primary launch
[Product Hunt]
↓
Persistent launch & discovery
[Aura++]
↓
Audience-specific amplification
[EarlyHunt] / [IndieHunt] / [Uneed]
↓
Maker distribution
[MakerHunt] / [SideHunt]
↓
Evergreen discovery
[Uno Directory]
↓
Content
Founder story → launch story → lessons learned → customer stories → product updates
This is much stronger than submitting the same product to 30 directories on one day.
The real goal of a startup launch
A launch is not successful because your product appeared on ten websites.
It is successful when the launch creates a compounding distribution asset.
One launch should ideally produce:
Traffic
→ Users
→ Feedback
→ Testimonials
→ Content
→ Search visibility
→ Brand recognition
→ More users
That's the flywheel.
And that's why the best launch strategy in 2026 isn't:
“Where can I submit my startup?”
It is:
“How can I make my startup discoverable in more places, to the right audiences, over a longer period of time?”
The founders who understand that distinction will get much more value from their launches than founders who treat launch day as a one-time marketing event.
I've been looking at how hiring platforms are evolving, and one trend keeps standing out: specialization.
General job boards have millions of listings, but they also come with a lot of noise—irrelevant roles, duplicate postings, outdated vacancies, and endless filtering.
For developers and other digital professionals, that can make job searching surprisingly frustrating.
It got me thinking: instead of trying to serve every industry, does it make more sense to build platforms dedicated to specific audiences?
I recently came across DigitalJobs (https://digitaljobs.com), a platform focused exclusively on digital and technology careers. Rather than being another general-purpose job board, it aims to connect employers with professionals in software engineering, AI, data, cybersecurity, product, design, and other digital fields.
The idea itself isn't revolutionary—there are already niche platforms for startups, remote work, and freelance talent—but I think there's still room for products that prioritize relevance over volume.
From a product perspective, the interesting challenge isn't building a job board; it's solving problems like:
Helping candidates find relevant opportunities faster
Reducing noise in search results
Improving the quality of employer-candidate matches
Creating a better experience for both job seekers and recruiters
I'm curious what other founders think.
If you were building a hiring platform today, what would you focus on?
Better matching with AI?
More transparency around salaries?
Skills-based hiring instead of resumes?
Something completely different?
I'd love to hear your thoughts.
I finally recorded the story of Aura++’s early days.
No growth hacks. Mostly finding founders on Product Hunt, messaging them personally, and over-delivering so they’d tell other people.
Also covered what didn’t work — because a lot of it didn’t.
Video: https://youtu.be/0MGovlWqfOE
Curious how others got their first 100 without a big audience.
Just published a video covering launch platforms, directories, communities, investor sites, and hidden gems beyond Product Hunt.
Video: https://youtu.be/vAn3bn5M5UY
Just published a video walking through Launch Kit — a new benefit included with every Premium launch on Aura++.
The problem: founders spend hours in Canva on launch day (or skip graphics entirely).
The solution: 9+ custom launch graphics made for your product, ready to download.
Video: https://youtu.be/5UnvYo68GZY
Hey IH 👋
Episode 2 of our Aura++ launch roundup is live.
I walk through 9 more products that launched on the platform:
• Brainbaby (all-in-one AI)
• Mandera (website growth)
• Seekdown (AI chatbot from content)
• AIWriteBook (KDP publishing)
• CreateVision (image & video AI)
• PromptMan (Mac prompt library)
• Revshare (affiliate attribution)
• WisGate (LLM routing API)
• Human Write (AI humanizer)
Watch: https://youtu.be/2NEsBroMkuE
Episode 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YU-9ZVn4AOo
What's the one tool from this list you'd actually pay for?
My first post on Reddit. Hopefully I will not get my account banned. Please upvote the post and help me crack Reddit.
Your upvote would mean the world to me
I work with founders on content, so I get to see a lot of niche SaaS products before they become widely known.
One that recently caught my attention is LorePanic (https://lorepanic.com), an AI assistant built specifically for tabletop RPG Game Masters.
What I found interesting wasn't the AI—it was the focus.
Instead of trying to be another general-purpose chatbot, it's designed to solve very specific problems for GMs: searching campaign notes, looking up rules across uploaded PDFs, remembering NPCs and locations, and even generating session recaps from live play.
It reminded me of something I've noticed across SaaS:
The best AI products often aren't the ones with the biggest audience—they're the ones solving the most painful workflow for a specific community.
A Game Master doesn't need AI to write an entire campaign.
They need answers like:
"Who gave the party this quest?"
"Where did they last meet this NPC?"
"What page explains this spell?"
That's a much more compelling use case than a generic chatbot.
I think we're going to see more founders win by building vertical AI instead of "AI for everyone."
If you're building a niche product, I'd love to hear:
Has focusing on a specific audience helped you get better customer feedback and faster product iterations?
Hey IH 👋
I just published a walkthrough of 9 products that launched on Aura++ — the platform I built for indie founders to get badges, dofollow backlinks, launch blog posts, and social distribution in one click.
7 minutes, no fluff. I go through each product and what makes it interesting:
• Reelry (AI reels)
• FAQ Templates
• ReleasePad (GitHub → changelog)
• AnyVids AI
• Sebora AI (autonomous SEO)
• Vizro AI (spreadsheets → dashboards)
• Arobis AI (AI search visibility)
• Backlink Catalog
• TurboStarter
Watch here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YU-9ZVn4AOo
If you've launched on Aura++ before — thank you. If you're thinking about launching, now's a good time.
What's the one tool from this list you'd actually use?
Comment