Data Arrow

Business Model → Data Model → dbt → Lineage → Graph Model

Visit Website

3 Comments

  1. 1
    The gap between business modeling and data engineering is the interesting part. Curious where users feel the friction most: understanding the model, translating it into dbt, or keeping the business and technical representations aligned.
    1. 1

      There are several complexities in modern data modelling, and many of them actually start with the fundamentals.

      Even with Kimball, one of the biggest challenges is translating business requirements into a clear, consistent model while staying true to dimensional modelling standards.

      That is exactly why we created Data Arrow — to help organize the different pieces of a business requirement and systematically translate them into a structured Kimball-based data model.

      At the same time, dbt is sometimes mistaken for a data modelling platform. In reality, dbt is primarily a powerful data transformation engine. The business model and modelling decisions still need to come first.

      Data Arrow is intended to bridge that gap:
      Business Requirement → Dimensional Model → dbt Transformation

      More than happy to have a discussion, walk through the approach, or offer access to the public preview free of cost for anyone interested in trying it.

      1. 1
        That makes sense. The business requirement → dimensional model → dbt transformation sequence makes the product’s role much clearer.

About

Draw what the business means. Turn that design into engineering artifacts. See how everything is connected. And be able to move between the model and the code instead of maintaining them as two separate worlds.