Good question. So far speed is what gets people in the door, but I think the evidence trail is what makes the result actually usable.
With AI-generated CVs, the bigger concern isn't whether it can rewrite a bullet quickly, it's whether you can trust what it changed and confidently defend it in an interview.
I'm still early though, so I'm curious to see which part users value more as I get more feedback.
That distinction makes sense. Speed gets the initial attention, but the evidence trail may be what determines whether users actually trust the output enough to use it.
About
I built MatchoCV because sending the same generic CV everywhere no longer works, and the job market is hard enough already.
3 Comments
The “invent nothing” rule is a meaningful differentiation.
Curious whether users notice the evidence trail as a reason to trust the output, or mainly care about getting the tailored CV faster.