The interview-prep use case feels much sharper than the broader transcription angle.
Curious whether people are mainly coming for interview review, or whether the broader “review conversations you’d otherwise forget” use case is proving strong enough to widen the positioning.
Interview review is actually a minority of the traffic — calls/meetings and pasted YouTube/video links make up most of it (way less friction than uploading a file), plus lectures. And oddly, a steady stream of people just uploading songs to get the lyrics 😅. So the broader "review a conversation you'd otherwise forget" framing seems to be the real driver of usage now — interviews are just where the whole thing started.
That’s useful context. It’ll be interesting to see whether that broader use case keeps holding as more people use it.
About
Originally built to prepare for job interviews: record a mock interview, get the transcript, and review what you actually said. Grew into a full transcription tool with speaker labels, timestamps, and AI summaries.
3 Comments
The interview-prep use case feels much sharper than the broader transcription angle.
Curious whether people are mainly coming for interview review, or whether the broader “review conversations you’d otherwise forget” use case is proving strong enough to widen the positioning.
Interview review is actually a minority of the traffic — calls/meetings and pasted YouTube/video links make up most of it (way less friction than uploading a file), plus lectures. And oddly, a steady stream of people just uploading songs to get the lyrics 😅.
So the broader "review a conversation you'd otherwise forget" framing seems to be the real driver of usage now — interviews are just where the whole thing started.