
Talio
Recruiter workspace for staffing agencies
I’m building Talio to solve a workflow problem I’ve seen over and over in staffing agencies:
the gap between receiving a client requirement and turning that into a clean, client-ready candidate submission.
A lot of teams are still juggling notes, CV edits, candidate tracking, and submission prep across too many tools.
Talio is my attempt to make that workflow simpler by helping agencies:
- capture structured job requirements
- manage candidates by role and stage
- generate tailored CVs
- prepare cleaner submissions for clients
Still early, and I’m actively looking for honest feedback from people who understand recruiting and staffing workflows.
About
Talio exists because many staffing agencies do not need heavier ATS platforms — they need a cleaner workflow. We’re building Talio to help agencies capture structured job requirements, manage candidates by role and stag

11 Comments
This looks like a strong launch 👏
The product is clean, useful, and market-ready.
We help digital products gain real traction through targeted creator growth campaigns 🚀
Open to exploring collaboration.
Thanks, appreciate it.
Thanks, really appreciate your reply! We actually help apps and websites grow by driving targeted, high-quality traffic through trusted creators and platforms — based on your exact audience.
Out of curiosity, what stage is your project at right now?
It is very cool. I was having the same issue, but from a job seeker perspective. I had applied to many job openings, and while applying, it was very frustrating to update my CSV to add an entry for each job. I built my own tool where, when I apply to a job, it automatically captures all the important information about the job and stores it, and I can easily access it via a dashboard. What Talio is doing is making the workflow simpler, which I think is the most useful thing nowadays.
That’s really interesting to hear. Honestly, when someone builds their own workaround, that usually says a lot about how real the problem is.
What you described is very close to what I’m trying to make easier — less manual tracking, less scattered info, less friction overall.
Out of curiosity, what was the most annoying part before you built your tool: saving the job details, tracking applications, tailoring your CV, or getting ready for interviews?
It was tracking my resume for each job application along with the job description. The reason is that when I was applying for jobs, I was changing the resume content to highlight the keywords according to the job description. A few times, when I got a recruiter call, I did not have the resume and job description for that role. So, that was the main reason I built that tool. All of my classmates use it right now, so it was a success in the end.
I’m just starting out and found this really useful
Really appreciate that — glad it felt useful.
This is interesting — I explored a similar direction at some point.
What I kept running into was that a lot of the friction wasn’t just in managing candidates, but in all the back-and-forth communication around them.
I ended up shifting focus toward solving that layer instead — helping people respond faster while keeping their own tone.
Curious — how much of the workflow friction you’re seeing is actually coming from communication vs the tools themselves?
That’s a really good point. I can definitely see how a lot of the pain isn’t just tracking things, but everything around it too.
I’m starting with the tracking and fit side first because that feels like the most immediate problem, but the communication side is super interesting.
Where did you feel that friction the most — recruiter follow-ups, interview coordination, or something else?
For me, the biggest friction is usually the follow-up loop: remembering who needs a reply, what context matters, and how to avoid sounding generic when checking in. Interview coordination is painful too, but follow-ups feel like the place where small delays or vague messages create the most damage.