tapurl.io

Smart URL shortener with analytics, geo routing & A/B tests

Visit Website
September 5, 2026 My Product Hunt launch flopped. Here's the plan I'm running instead.

I launched tapurl (a link shortener for affiliates) on Product Hunt

last month. It flopped — barely a ripple. My first instinct was "the

product's wrong." But looking closer, the problem was simpler: Product

Hunt is full of makers and founders, not affiliate marketers and media

buyers. Right product, wrong room.

So I stopped chasing one big launch moment and started building two

slower engines instead.

1. Show up where the pain actually lives. My users hang out in

affiliate subreddits and forums, asking exactly the questions tapurl

answers — "how do I send US and EU traffic to different Amazon stores

from one link?", "why do my YouTube links convert so badly on mobile?"

(that one's an in-app browser problem, by the way). I answer those

genuinely, no link-dropping, ~9 helpful comments for every 1 that

mentions what I build. Slower, but the traffic is actually qualified.

2. Own the search intent. People google "bitly alternative" and

"geo-targeting affiliate links" every day. That's warm traffic that

finds me instead of the other way around. So I'm writing real content

(here's one on the engineering behind it:

https://tapurl.io/blog/building-a-link-shortener-fastapi-htmx) and

getting listed where people compare tools.

The meta-lesson: a flopped launch usually isn't a broken product, it's

the wrong audience in the room. Find the room where your users already

complain about the problem you solve, and show up useful.

Building tapurl solo on a lean FastAPI + htmx stack. Happy to answer

anything about the distribution grind — still very much in it.

2 Comments

  1. 1
    The audience mismatch seems well supported, but the next useful distinction is qualified traffic vs qualified demand. Are the subreddit/search visitors actually creating links and using tapurl repeatedly, or are they just more relevant people clicking through?
    1. 1
      Great distinction, and honestly the right one to hold my feet to. Truth is I'm too early to claim qualified demand yet — I'd be guessing if I said these visitors are creating links and coming back. Right now I can only really claim qualified *traffic*: more relevant people landing, not proven retention. What I'm watching to tell the two apart: signup rate from those visitors vs. cold traffic, and the one metric that actually separates "clicked through" from "using it" — whether they create a second link after the first. A one-and-done link is a tourist; someone who comes back to make link #2, #3 is the start of real demand. So the honest status is: audience mismatch fixed, qualified traffic improving, qualified demand still unproven. Ask me again in a month and I should have the retention numbers to actually answer this instead of theorize. Appreciate the push — it's the question I should be organizing my metrics around.

About

Link tools were either too dumb (just clicks) or too expensive. I wanted geo-routing, A/B tests and postbacks in one link, without $100+/mo. So I built tapurl: affiliate-grade tracking, free-forever.