The part about ideas living across notes, voice memos and half-finished drafts feels very real. Turning that mess into something that actually becomes useful work is a much sharper problem than “another notes app.”
Feels like trieva could be pulling in a lot more organic traffic than it is right now. Especially in early access where you’re still learning whether consultants and advisors see their own workflow in it.
Are people describing their problem back to you in a similar way so far?
The strongest part is that trieva started as a workflow problem, not a feature idea. The real positioning question seems to be whether “connecting ideas to research and turning them into useful work” is the recurring pain strong enough to pull consultants out of their existing notes systems.
About
I built trieva because I needed a better way to capture ideas as they appeared, connect them to my research and existing work, and follow them through to something useful, rather than just being random notes I kept.
2 Comments
The part about ideas living across notes, voice memos and half-finished drafts feels very real. Turning that mess into something that actually becomes useful work is a much sharper problem than “another notes app.”
Feels like trieva could be pulling in a lot more organic traffic than it is right now. Especially in early access where you’re still learning whether consultants and advisors see their own workflow in it.
Are people describing their problem back to you in a similar way so far?
The strongest part is that trieva started as a workflow problem, not a feature idea. The real positioning question seems to be whether “connecting ideas to research and turning them into useful work” is the recurring pain strong enough to pull consultants out of their existing notes systems.