Votenandi
Vote your leader digitally through our app
-
1
Starting with campus elections creates an interesting gap between where you're validating Votenandi and where you ultimately want it to operate.
The product may work in both environments, but the evidence each environment gives you won't necessarily mean the same thing.
-
1
You hit the nail on the head regarding the gap in validation signals.
Campus elections give us rapid feedback on voter experience, UI friction, and execution velocity,but they definitely don't validate institutional trust or military grade threat compliance for county clerks.
Our strategy is to treat campus pilots as our operational sandbox to refine voter interaction and build early revenue, while building the core architecture to Federal and VSSC (Voting System Standards) specifications from day one.
The goal isn't to claim a university SGA win equals government readiness, but rather to prove operational reliability while we navigate the longer compliance and sales pipeline required for UOCAVA/civic markets.
How would you recommend structuring our initial milestones to better align campus proof-points with what institutional election buyers actually look for?
-
1
I appreciate you explaining the distinction.
I’d be interested in continuing the conversation outside the thread. What’s the best email to reach you on?
-
1
Thanks for reaching out! You can reach me directly at ijayvarshan@gmail..com. I can't post links yet, So I added double dots between gmail and com.Looking forward to connecting.
-
-
-
Comment